Presentation Guideline
A1 Summary poster:
Self sufficient and gives key
information about your proposal (portrait)
Place in appropriate room before
your session
Rest of Presentation:
Format decided in class (posters,
animations, movies, PowerPoint)
10 minute presentation
Submit all files for assessment on
a disk
Presentations and Submissions Due:
6 November 2012
Blog Due: 9 November 2012
Project 2 Assessment Guide
Project is assessed though your
blog documenting ideas and design development history, and outcomes
communicated in your final presentation and submission
Script:
Your ability to strategically
communicate an architectural proposal through a creative and logically
realistic constructed series of events in the form of a factitious story
Reality (12.5%)
Have relevant contexts you can
observe today been studies and well incorporated into your architecture
Has the development been documented
in your blog and presented in the final submission
Description: Is your story based on
contexts that we are in today and assumptions made are realistic and believable
based on what you can observe today. (Imagine yourself in your scenario and how
you would be living in your version of the future)
Creativity (12.5%)
Have background contexts extracted
from your teams scenario in project 1 and developed into a unique and
imaginative plot for your architecture fiction
Has development been documented in
blog and submission
Description: Creatively show your
proposal is relevant and communicate your proposal through methods of your
choice (series of captured scenes, storyboard/ and or movie)
Stage:
Architectural entity is considered
the main stage of your architecture fiction. Your story should be a response to
the future contexts you communicate in your story. Your story should best
describe the most important aspects.
Purpose (15%)
Has it been defined in response to
the needs and desires of future citizens?
Is the design response appropriate?
Has development been documented in
your blog and final submission?
Description: Why should your
proposal be realized? How does it offer meaningful spaces and services for
future citizens?
Navigation (15%)
Has specific uses of your proposed
spaces been studies and the circulation within and or access to the entity been
studied and demonstrated?
Is it evident in the design?
Has it been documented in the blog
and submission?
Description: How do people arrive
at a space?
How do they find the space?
How do they move between spaces?
How does it offer appropriate
access and circulation?
Integrity (15%)
Is structural and operational
integrity and unity clearly visible in your design proposal?
Are appropriate structures,
details, materials and technologies used to construct your spaces?
Documented in blog and submission
Description: Demonstrate design
decisions are informed by clear understanding of physical and practical
limitations and opportunities
Demonstrate structural and
operational integrity of physical and virtual spaces/ artifacts
Scenes:
Ability to communicate the values
and relevance of your architectural proposal.
Presence and Identity (15%)
Has presence and relevance to the
proposal and its identity been considered with what should provide and be known
for?
Documented on blog and presented
Description: Physical and
psychological presence is appropriate for the area/context and signifies your
reason and purpose of existence
Give specific consideration to how
people identify and recognize proposal as a whole within the context of your
site
First- person experience (15%)
Has experience of users been
considered and effectively presented from the perspective of users?
Documentation of blog and
submission
Description: Design decisions are
bases on the requirements of people who use the spaces proposed
Construct scenarios to depict how
specific needs and circumstances experience and utilize spaces proposed
No comments:
Post a Comment