The first lecture set the frame work and structure for the
unit content. I am enthusiastic about the prospect of receiving more freedom to
interpret and respond to the direction and methods given to us. The lecture
implied that the guidance given to us by our tutors will be suggestive, based
on our individual interpretations of the tasks.
I was interested in the suggestion that an architectural
proposition should be a response to needs, and that needs should be identified
by considering multiple contexts.
Climate
Cultural
Ecological
Economic
Geographical
Political
Social
Technological
I agree with the notion that solutions should be a response
to yesterdays needs. It seems evident that we, as architects should be
envisioning instead of responding to what we see today. The solutions and decisions
we make should have the potential to be applicable for the future, and maintain
thoughtful future vision and strategy.
Perhaps the process of envisioning our project site as a
stage, our architectural entity as scenes, and our users as characters will
expand creativity, and plan a well thought out solution that enable the output
we want to achieve.
No comments:
Post a Comment