Saturday, July 28, 2012

WEEK ONE READING: BEYOND ARCHITECTURE


The reading communicated many intriguing concepts. It touches on architecture that is industrially designed, the process of technological transfer, expression of expendability/prefab/modular, and indeterminacy.

What I really liked and appreciated about this reading was the idea that architecture is like a still shot. It provides a momentary manifestation of contextual ideas that are presently relevant.

Modernism has been described as the nature of the modern world to be dynamism which is wrought by “mechanication, economic liberalization, social upheaval, and new insight into the physical world.”

The idea of adjoining spaces is explored with the addition of technology into the design process. This creates flow, multifunctionalism, and the introduction of prefabricated components. The design becomes a way to frame individual functions and maintain unity. A house becomes a tool, as is the motor of a car… and not just a solidly built objects that sets out to defy time.

I’m interested in the concept of space being transformable and flexible. I think the future needs architecture that can change as our needs do. 

Friday, July 27, 2012

WEEK ONE LECTURE: INVESTIGATIONS AND OBJECTIVES


The first lecture set the frame work and structure for the unit content. I am enthusiastic about the prospect of receiving more freedom to interpret and respond to the direction and methods given to us. The lecture implied that the guidance given to us by our tutors will be suggestive, based on our individual interpretations of the tasks.

I was interested in the suggestion that an architectural proposition should be a response to needs, and that needs should be identified by considering multiple contexts.

Climate
Cultural
Ecological
Economic
Geographical
Political
Social
Technological

I agree with the notion that solutions should be a response to yesterdays needs. It seems evident that we, as architects should be envisioning instead of responding to what we see today. The solutions and decisions we make should have the potential to be applicable for the future, and maintain thoughtful future vision and strategy.

Perhaps the process of envisioning our project site as a stage, our architectural entity as scenes, and our users as characters will expand creativity, and plan a well thought out solution that enable the output we want to achieve.